HOME | Freese & Goss

Business Interruption Insurance Claims

During the Covid-19 pandemic shutdowns, many insurance companies have denied business interruption claims from restaurants and other businesses.

More...

Protecting People Like You!

Freese & Goss is a nationally recognized trial firm committed to protecting the rights of the injured. The firm focuses its work on mass tort and personal injury cases with a particular emphasis on product liability cases involving medical devices or pharmaceutical drugs. Over the past ten years, F&G has successfully prosecuted numerous, significant drug and medical device cases and has resolved over 1 billion dollars in cases on behalf of injured consumers. F&G’s reputation as experienced and effective litigators has resulted in its appointment to numerous plaintiffs’ steering committees and executive committees for multi-district litigations throughout the United States.

Areas we Practice

Dangerous Drugs

Zantac

Medical Devices

Clergy Abuse

Personal Injury

Consumer Class Action

Business Interruption

Trucking Accidents

Meet Our Attorneys

Richard A Freese

Founding Partner

Attorney Richard A Freese is a founding partner of Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Tamara L Banno

Partner

Attorney Tamara "Tammy" L Banno is a partner at Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Kevin Edwards

Of Counsel

Attorney Kevin Edwards is of counsel at Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Yvette Diaz

Associate

Attorney Yvette Diaz is an associate with Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Tim K Goss

Founding Partner

Attorney Tim K Goss is a founding partner of Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Peter de la Cerda

Of Counsel

Attorney Pedro “Peter” de la Cerda is of counsel at Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Sara Turman-Vedral

Associate

Attorney Sara Turman-Vedral is an associate at Freese & Goss, PLLC.

J. Mitchell Hastings

Associate

Attorney Mitchell Hastings is an associate with Freese & Goss, PLLC.

Recent Verdicts & Settlements

Salazar v. Boston Scientific, Corp. et al., Cause No. DC-12-14349 (Dallas County, Texas).

$73,465,000 verdict for Plaintiff. The verdict obtained in this case has the distinction of being the 26th largest verdict in the United States in 2014. This case involved claims for defective design and inadequate warnings relating to a pelvic mesh device. It produced the first verdict for a plaintiff in a pelvic mesh case against Boston Scientific.

Free Case Review

We are happy to review your issues and advise if we can help. Please let us know what your issue pertains to so we can help you find the right attorney: