Business Interruption Insurance Claims
During the Covid-19 pandemic shutdowns, many insurance companies have denied business interruption claims from restaurants and other businesses.
Protecting People Like You!
Freese & Goss is a nationally recognized trial firm committed to protecting the rights of the injured. The firm focuses its work on mass tort and personal injury cases with a particular emphasis on product liability cases involving medical devices or pharmaceutical drugs. Over the past ten years, F&G has successfully prosecuted numerous, significant drug and medical device cases and has resolved over 1 billion dollars in cases on behalf of injured consumers. F&G’s reputation as experienced and effective litigators has resulted in its appointment to numerous plaintiffs’ steering committees and executive committees for multi-district litigations throughout the United States.
Areas we Practice
Dangerous Drugs
Zantac
Medical Devices
Clergy Abuse
Personal Injury
Consumer Class Action
Business Interruption
Trucking Accidents
Meet Our Attorneys
Richard A Freese
Founding Partner
Attorney Richard A Freese is a founding partner of Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Tamara L Banno
Partner
Attorney Tamara "Tammy" L Banno is a partner at Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Kevin Edwards
Of Counsel
Attorney Kevin Edwards is of counsel at Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Yvette Diaz
Associate
Attorney Yvette Diaz is an associate with Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Tim K Goss
Founding Partner
Attorney Tim K Goss is a founding partner of Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Peter de la Cerda
Of Counsel
Attorney Pedro “Peter” de la Cerda is of counsel at Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Sara Turman-Vedral
Associate
Attorney Sara Turman-Vedral is an associate at Freese & Goss, PLLC.
Recent Verdicts & Settlements
Recent Verdicts & Settlements
Salazar v. Boston Scientific, Corp. et al., Cause No. DC-12-14349 (Dallas County, Texas).
$73,465,000 verdict for Plaintiff. The verdict obtained in this case has the distinction of being the 26th largest verdict in the United States in 2014. This case involved claims for defective design and inadequate warnings relating to a pelvic mesh device. It produced the first verdict for a plaintiff in a pelvic mesh case against Boston Scientific.
Free Case Review
We are happy to review your issues and advise if we can help. Please let us know what your issue pertains to so we can help you find the right attorney:
